Redemption® Card Game > Game Play Variations
Type 3
Arrthoa:
What I heard was that it qualifies for both T1 and T2 by having 100 cards and follows T1 deck rules
Redoubter:
--- Quote from: jmhartz on April 11, 2012, 02:20:26 AM ---I think that requiring the deck to be exactly 60 cards would be nice, in addition to your other stipulations.
--- End quote ---
I actually really like this idea myself. I'll make a deck to try out soon.
Prof Underwood:
--- Quote from: Arrthoa on April 11, 2012, 03:06:23 AM ---What I heard was that it qualifies for both T1 and T2 by having 100 cards and follows T1 deck rules
--- End quote ---
This was the first Type 1.5 deck that I heard about, and was created by a guy named Rick Majus I think down in the South Florida playgroup. Apparently he had quite a bit of success with it down there.
However, I also like the idea of a 60 card minimum with a requirement of 6 LS for victory. I just wouldn't call it Type 1.5.
Red:
--- Quote from: Prof Underwood on April 11, 2012, 04:20:58 AM ---
--- Quote from: Arrthoa on April 11, 2012, 03:06:23 AM ---What I heard was that it qualifies for both T1 and T2 by having 100 cards and follows T1 deck rules
--- End quote ---
This was the first Type 1.5 deck that I heard about, and was created by a guy named Jonathan Majus I think down in the South Florida playgroup. Apparently he had quite a bit of success with it down there.
However, I also like the idea of a 60 card minimum with a requirement of 6 LS for victory. I just wouldn't call it Type 1.5.
--- End quote ---
People keep getting that mixed up. so FTFY.
Minister Polarius:
Calling it T 1.5 would probably be fine since most people have never heard of the first version. However, calling it Standard Type or something with more of a catchy name may be better anyway.
I'd love the idea if it were, as suggested, exactly 60 cards rather than minimum 60 cards.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version