Make your 2013 Redemption National Tournament travel plans now! Free booster packs for pre-registering!
i was thinking that toook that's itno doms PERIODas for the single brigade comment i don't wanna say to people who play sitelocks "hey you can't play sites cause colors don't matter" and i was thinking about the sitelock players is alland i figure if i keep characters as single brigaded characters it would leave sitelock able to be played
i'd think the evil character wins by immunity, but you can play bow and arrow on weaker evil characters or stronger ones such as Naaman with naaman's chariot and horses which would be pshycotic
then how bout i make a rule that the cannot be negated special ability has no effect?
what do you suggest, professor?
but I just think that it is too easily abused.
Placer priests would rock in this variant.
Quote from: New Raven BR on January 09, 2010, 08:22:20 PMi'd think the evil character wins by immunity, but you can play bow and arrow on weaker evil characters or stronger ones such as Naaman with naaman's chariot and horses which would be pshycoticSo immune to (any brigade) = Immune to every enhancement?
then i'll just have to limit certain types of enhancments
I wouldn't have a problem with banning all Enhancements that cause more than two cards to be drawn by a given player.
Quote from: Minister Polarius on January 18, 2010, 10:27:22 PMI wouldn't have a problem with banning all Enhancements that cause more than two cards to be drawn by a given player.because being able to draw 4 cards (Archer + anybody w/ Namaan's Chariot and 2k Horses) followed by Gib's Trick, Wonder's Forgotten, Forgotten History, and Haman's Plot isn't a problem?